URGENT:
The new Immigration Bill is bad news for those of us seeking asylum in the UK.
The Bill will go to the House of Lords to be debated on 22nd December.
There is cross-bench support for the amendments proposed by many of the charities supporting asylum seekers
(ie from Labour/Lib Dems/Conservative/ independents and Bishops).
YOU CAN STILL influence the decision by writing about your concerns TODAY!
Check out the Regional Asylum Support Activists website link to a model letter:
http ://regionalasylumactivism . org/2015/12/15/urgent-call-to-action-as-immigration-bill-2015-heads-to-the-house-of-lords/
You can write a simple email by using the website ‘Writetothem’.
(The following members of the House of Lords, for example, WILL be interested to hear from YOU:
Lord Roberts, Lord Hussain, Baroness Hamwee, Baroness Lister, Baroness Manzoor, Baroness Smith, Earl of Leicester, Earl of Sandwich, Earl of Listowel.)
Here’s a simple example of a letter to help you :
[Your address]
[date]
[Member of the Lords]
House of Lords
London
SW1A 0PW
Dear
Re: 2nd Reading of the Immigration Bill to be debated on 22nd December
I’m writing to you because of my concerns about the effects of the latest Immigration Bill that you will debate on 22nd December.
I am a member of a grassroots organisation called Manchester City of Sanctuary, which tries to build a culture of welcome towards refugees and people seeking sanctuary from war and political persecution and threat to life.
City of Sanctuary brought asylum seekers to Parliament on 1st December to an event ‘Sanctuary in Parliament’. We were very disappointed to see all of the amendments to the Bill rejected.
Please could you look again at this debate because the amendments were an honest attempt to advert human tragedy, to protect the rights of vulnerable children and reform the detention system that can lock innocent people up indefinitely?
The Immigration Bill 2015 will result in more asylum-related destitution. Removing section 4 support when so many initial decisions prove unreliable will leave more people on the street ‘without recourse to public funds’, unable to work to support themselves. This destitution will include children.
Asylum seekers sign monthly, always fearful of being detained indefinitely, though they are not criminals but deeply traumatised individuals who need to be heard. Over 50% of refused claims are eventually upheld with adequate legal assistance.
Please would you attend the debate and vote on behalf of destitue asylum seekers who cannot go home.
Yours sincerely,